🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a district court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

This decision is part of a national battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican majority. Ordinarily, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several more conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas AG praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic figure argued the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.