🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the optimal pick for a bold scary movie centered on Jesus Christ, but not for the motivations many fans could guess. Actually, the star doesn't actually portray Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: the part he plays is referred to only as The Carpenter. The actor is cast as the Joseph within this tale, striving to maintain his religious convictions while The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), his adolescent foster child, begins to show supernatural abilities. The reason it's challenging to imagine a different prominent performer taking this character is that even as the role becomes stricken with various challenges, the actor seems nearly touchingly convinced that the dark, grim little movie is worth his time.

The Actor's Recent Film Selections

Cage has using his time more carefully lately. He still does more films than the majority of average viewers will ever see — for example, were you informed that he has completed three distinct cowboy movies in the past three years? — yet he also includes prestige A24/Neon gigs for example Dream Scenario, Pig, and a further title. This new film appears to be a similar project, as it’s not strictly scary, possibly controversial, and approaches a campy-sounding premise with gravity.

Movie's Premise and Direction

Sadly, writer-director the director does not reward the audience's focus. The Carpenter’s Son begins with a interestingly wandering context, marketed as inspired by an obscure religious text concerning Christ’s childhood. Cage's character, The Mother, and their child relocate frequently, anxious of religious persecution or distrust regarding The Boy’s unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” Cage gloomily remarks. It goes on as sinister entities focus on the household where they currently live, getting a jump-start on that well-known scriptural test for the son.

At times, the film resembles an demonic possession-type horror film, though not one of the lead characters are directly possessed. On the contrary, they become more and more distant from each other, when these entities affect a nearby girl (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) who the son connects to, and gives each character troubling visions of a dark tomorrow. Cage's role in particular fights with his place in the narrative, at times berating his child he doesn't completely grasp.

Controversy and Caution

The content is likely to invite debate, and the director treats it with plenty of care — too much, perhaps. The concept of a young man confronted with his future martyrdom and tempted by unknown powers is indeed terrifying, but Nathan might be cautious about seeming gratuitous and keen to signal his aims, therefore he regularly falls back on dimly foreboding filming. Characters brood incessantly — the singer-actress, who showed real promise in another movie, of all things — yields her role to her character's costume, at times punctuated by a few gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Performance and Film's Flaws

Meanwhile, the actor toy with exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his more snickering appreciators may desire. One scene (also included) in promotional material where Cage flips out and yells “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of florid outburst is part of your biblical thriller, possibly a more openly absurd method would take better advantage of his eagerness to exaggerate when necessary. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son is closer to the less successful straight-to-DVD productions he starred in during the last decade — excluding the campy action films so much as the narrative films and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and often contain some select actor's highlights, but in the end seem like, well, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, some of those, although simpler, were more watchable in general. This is when I have to break my own dogma, not faith-based but professional: Previously, a beloved editor persuaded me to eliminate descriptive terms like “boring” or “dull” from my reviewing language. These phrases communicate minimal but a personal and vaguely expressed impatience, disengaging from the job of vibrantly communicating the mental and emotional experience of watching a particular movie. It's challenging to communicate monotony without appearing dull yourself. It's equally vague as calling a movie “interesting.” “Elaborate,” in other words.

Yet, I acknowledge, I was bored during much of The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it is a churchy kind of stultification, not because The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but as it demands a kind of obedient endurance to view it. Eventually in the beginning, the film locks into a monotonous pattern of simmering anguish, and does not